Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Infection Control ; (4): 654-657, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-482230

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the differences between two statistical methods for evaluating non-sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria to antimicrobial agents,and explore effect of non-consideration of clinical background on evalua-ting extent of bacterial resistance.Methods Data of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter spp .in a hospital in the first half year of 2008,2010 and 2013 were collected and conducted statistical analysis with two methods (me-thod 1 :based on all clinically isolated bacteria;method 2 :based on infection-related non-repetitive bacteria),two methods for evaluating bacterial non-sensitive rates to antimicrobial agents were compared.Results The non-sensi-tive rates of Acinetobacter spp .to various antimicrobial agents :statistical results by using method 1 were generally higher than those using method 2,absolute difference between two statistical methods was 10.46%-33.77%;the non-sensitive rates of Staphylococcus aureus to various antimicrobial agents :except compound sulfamethoxazole in 2010 and 2013(difference were 6.17% and 10.21 % respectively),penicillin G (difference was 3.86%),erythromy-cin (difference was 2.71 %),and azithromycin in 2013 (difference was 2.43%),statistical results by using method 1 were generally higher than those using method 2,absolute difference between two statistical methods was 0-18.04%.Conclusion There are deviation in the non-sensitive rates of bacterial strains to antimicrobial agents by using two different statistical methods,deviation is larger in Acinetobacter spp ..The resistance level might be incorrectly higher when evaluating the resistance status without considering clinical background of bacteria.

2.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ; (12)1999.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-677834

ABSTRACT

AIM: To observe the efficacy of hemoperfusion (HP) to treat one case suffering from overdose digoxin poisoning. METHODS: HA 330 ml and YT 160 hemoperfusion cartridges were used and blood vessel was femoral vein, single needle and two chamber catheter. Four HP were done. RESULTS: The blood digoxin level were 16 ?g?L -1 before and after the 1st HP, 9.22 ?g?L -1 at the 2nd, 12.4 ?g?L -1 before the 3th, 10.45 ?g?L -1 after the 3th, 3.22 ?g?L -1 before the 4th, and 2.84 ?g?L -1 after the 4th HP. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrats that multiple HP at different period may decrease the blood digoxin level step by step.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL